3 ms·
The first half of this is a complaint that public policy discussions are meant to be public, rather than rubber-stamping decisions made by insiders behind close
by kps 6y ago
The first half of this is a complaint that public policy discussions are meant to be public, rather than rubber-stamping decisions made by insiders behind closed doors. I am not inspired.
- wolfram74 6y agoA bit reductive, the point the author makes about how what's able to be stored for the public record greatly reduces the functionality of the medium they're meeting over. The fact the chat transcript, or emote usage can't be stored with time stamps seems like a misstep on zoom's part. Perhaps stored as closed captions?
- titanomachy 6y agoIt's a citizens' committee making non-binding recommendations... I don't know if the entirety of their internal communication needs to be livestreamed and recorded. The actual debate by decision-makers will be in a public council anyway, and if the recommendations don't stand on their own merits then they won't get implemented.