3 ms·
djb would beg to differ: https://cr.yp.to/djbdns/blurb/unbind.html https://cr.yp.to/djbdns/blurb/unbind.html [EDIT]: https://www.google.com/search?channel=fs&
by ur-whale 6y ago
djb would beg to differ:
https://cr.yp.to/djbdns/blurb/unbind.html https://cr.yp.to/djbdns/blurb/unbind.html
[EDIT]:
https://www.google.com/search?channel=fs&client=ubuntu&q=bind+site%3Acr.yp.to https://www.google.com/search?channel=fs&client=ubuntu&q=bin...
- anticristi 6y agoNice one! I ran both BIND and tinydns. I loved how tinydns only did authoritative DNS, whereas BIND mixed two different servers, with completely different risk profiles: authoritative and resolver.
- everybodyknows 6y agoLatest date in djb post is 2002.08.08, and latest bind version mentioned is 9.2.1 Current is 9.17: https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/ https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/ Full history is here: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/blob/main/HISTORY.md https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/blob/main/HISTOR... Anyone familiar with the interim changes, care to synopsize?