> They reduce cases but they’re not perfect, Which is why the statement ‘if only we had worn the masks’ is false. And I don’t personally care but it is a sneak

> They reduce cases but they’re not perfect, Which is why the statement ‘if only we had worn the masks’ is false. And I don’t personally care but it is a sneaky way of turning people against each other and a way to avoid responsibility: If you’re a government which has wasted billions on lockdowns and it hasn’t helped, how convenient is it to shift the blame to all these silly anti-maskers. And I mind you, I am not anti science and I am not anti masks. I am against the statement ‘if only they had worn the masks.’ About half a year ago scientific ’authorities’ here said that if you get infected you must have done something against the measures, insinuating it was your own fault. That kind of stopped now that hospital workers turn out to get infected all the time. Are they anti-maskers? Do they not know how to avoid contact? Are they careless? Or is it unavoidable? To accept that, we also have to accept that you can’t get away with simply blaming everything on anti-science noncompliance.