4 ms·
> You are denying Pol Pot killing 1 million Cambodians was "genocide". No. > As I said even by your legal definition the Chinese are not committing genocide a
by hh3k0 6y ago
> You are denying Pol Pot killing 1 million Cambodians was "genocide".
No.
> As I said even by your legal definition the Chinese are not committing genocide against the Uyghurs.
Counterpoint: They absolutely are.
https://www.npr.org/2020/07/04/887239225/china-suppression-of-uighur-minorities-meets-u-n-definition-of-genocide-report-s https://www.npr.org/2020/07/04/887239225/china-suppression-o...
- aaron695 6y agoGood link, Adrian Zenz is not big on the 'gays' and stuff, off topic but - Worthy to Escape: Why All Believers Will Not Be Raptured Before the Tribulation - Adrian Zenz - https://www.amazon.com.au/Worthy-Escape-Believers-Raptured-Tribulation/dp/144976908X https://www.amazon.com.au/Worthy-Escape-Believers-Raptured-T... Although it must suck having a Chinese army dragging out info on who their opponents are, I personally are critical of someone who looks at Christian documents to pin down technical data on the Rapture. I don't care if someone doesn't personally approve of homosexuals or believes in the Rapture, but when they publish on it, I use that to judge their other work. And this is were we differ, your 'good' sources are simply not my 'good' sources. The first thing on Wiki or Goggle is not a source to me.
- hh3k0 6y ago> Good link, Adrian Zenz is not big on the 'gays' and stuff, off topic but - Off topic, indeed. And a logical fallacy to boot. > I personally are critical of someone who looks at Christian documents to pin down technical data on the Rapture. Irrelevant, as that isn't what we're talking about. Your -- now flagged -- original comment referred to the forced sterilizations too. What you think of Adrian Zenz or the UN definition of genocide is absolutely irrelevant. There are no two ways about it: forced abortions and sterilizations _do_ fullfil the UN definition of genocide.