3 ms·
The problem becomes how you quantify your opponent's knowledge from a subjective position. How can you prove that they don't know what they are talking about w
by aww_dang 6y ago
The problem becomes how you quantify your opponent's knowledge from a subjective position.
How can you prove that they don't know what they are talking about without disputing the points they have made?
You must attack the argument, not the person.
- user-the-name 6y agoNo, you really don't. This isn't a mathematical proof. This isn't a formal debate. This is regular, common-sense discussion. Pointing out that a guy who is not an expert in a field is making claims that go against the actual experts in that field is a perfectly reasonable argument, and ignoring it is intentionally blinding yourself.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]