The poster is not engaged in a good faith argument so there isn't much point in explaining these sorts of details. My observation has been that in Canada and t

The poster is not engaged in a good faith argument so there isn't much point in explaining these sorts of details. My observation has been that in Canada and the UK any sort of selective or regional restrictions have been extremely ineffective and they offer evidence to people who would like to make bad-faith arguments about the power of restrictions. My opinion is that two things appear to work to get you manageable levels of COVID-19. The first is broad restrictive measures over very large geographical areas that actually reduce time indoors with other people and compel mask use (some of the Canadian provinces did this well). The second is simply letting the epidemic reach levels that scare people into changing their behaviour (many US states).