4 ms·
Airbus A300-600/A310 Airbus A330 Boeing 747-400 Boeing 767/KC-46 Boeing 777 McDonnell Douglas MD-11
by arnon 6y ago
Airbus A300-600/A310
Airbus A330
Boeing 747-400
Boeing 767/KC-46
Boeing 777
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
- rob74 6y ago...however the exact type of engine Boeing is using for the 777 (PW4000-112 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_PW4000#PW4000-112 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_PW4000#PW400...) is not used by any other airliner. I'm no expert, but as the most powerful -112 version has almost twice the thrust of the -94 version, I wouldn't automatically conclude that problems with one type mean that there are also problems with the other types. OTOH, if they take a closer look at the 777 engines and find a lot with problems that went undetected until now, I assume the other PW4000 engines will get a closer inspection as well...
- arnon 6y agoThe core is the same. The different model numbers typically represent other configurations of the stages or pump throughput, type of FADEC, and all of these things.
- kayfox 6y agoIts noted that a 747 had a very similar issue the same day as this 777 with the same series of engine. Since the issue is most likely with fracture detection during maintenance inspection and P&W introduced new procedures for that a few years back, its likely the issue is with the tech being used or the procedures. Which would mean any P&W engines using the same technologies and procedures to detect fan and turbine blade cracks would be affected.