4 ms·
64GB was available on the previous Mac Mini, but they took a step backwards and capped the new one at 16GB, no reason they won't do the same with the MBP.
by akmarinov 6y ago
64GB was available on the previous Mac Mini, but they took a step backwards and capped the new one at 16GB, no reason they won't do the same with the MBP.
- rbanffy 6y agoThe Intel Mac Mini is still sold. If you need, you can get it with 64GB of RAM and 2TB of PCIe SSD. Granted you'll feel bad if this leak is wrong and Apple shows an M1x with more than 16GB of RAM.
- Applejinx 6y agoI literally have a previous Mac Mini with maxed-out RAM thanks to OWC and their RAM upgrades. Also one of the new Macbook Pros. From my experience with both, I think you might be very unhappy in retrospect if you bet that more RAM is going to make the most recent Intel one come within shouting distance of even an 8GB M1 Mini. The old one was one of the best for single-core performance within its generation, but they're not even the same thing, not even close. Again, I own both machines with the Intel Mini maxed out as far as it can go with RAM. My gut level reaction is, you could give the new one lots more RAM (in theory) and it wouldn't end up using it. So they're capping them, otherwise people will assume there's a benefit and that the 8GB and 16GB ones aren't workable for heavy processing. I've also got a suspicion (possibly just a weird cynicism) that this is why the previous-gen Mac Pro runs so huge and expensive: they've overpriced and overdesigned it so hard that it's unattainable for nearly anybody, making it a sort of status object with Veblen pricing, specifically to avoid class action lawsuits when they release newer machines that outperform it at a tenth of the price. You were never supposed to actually buy the monstro cheese grater Mac Pro or its screen with the thousand dollar stand, and if you did, (a) it's of symbolic value to you and (b) it's your own fault. When the real high performance computer comes out of Apple it'll be at Mac Mini prices, and meant to iPhone-ify desktop computing as a category.
- eli 6y agoClass action lawsuits?
- gumby 6y agoBecause there’s a ceiling on RAM capacity? If that’s your requirement there are many people happy to sell you a device that will satisfy you. I started computing in the days when you could add your own instructions to your computer. I’m not suing anyone though that capability is no longer available
- 082349872349872 6y agoWhen the user guide prominently includes a wiring diagram for adding the memory necessary to run the product: http://users.telenet.be/kim1-6502/6502/2ksa/2ksa.html http://users.telenet.be/kim1-6502/6502/2ksa/2ksa.html Cover:Schematics for a 5V, 3A regulated power supply and a 1K x 8 read/write memory block. The power supply and three such memory blocks can be added to the basic KIM-l microcomputer to provide the 4K RAM required by this assembler. Parts are available from Jameco Electronics.
- EricE 6y agoYou can still buy the Intel Mini for a reason. I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption to expect a mini that takes more than 16GB of RAM. They just started the Apple Silicon transition. A bit early for the doom and gloom, no?
- hajile 6y agoI suspect they'll release a faster mac mini with the M1x chip. They've got tons of space and an oversized PSU, so it would be easy to do.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]