4 ms·
I'm sure someone will come up with a counterexample, but my experience is that pretty much everything is backwards compatible.
by goodcanadian 6y ago
I'm sure someone will come up with a counterexample, but my experience is that pretty much everything is backwards compatible.
- bregma 6y agoC++17 was backwards compatible with the venerable C++11 in almost all ways except for the removal of some library constructs few people actually use and have long been replaced by superior models, like `std::auto_ptr` and the old binder functors.