4 ms·
When they don't incorporate quick banning they get piled on by a mob for letting this or that bad person on their platform. And it's near impossible to monitor
by Tenoke 6y ago
When they don't incorporate quick banning they get piled on by a mob for letting this or that bad person on their platform. And it's near impossible to monitor all of Youtube just with content moderators.
- nostromo 6y ago> piled on by a mob That’s the perception - but usually it’s at most a few hundred busybodies on Twitter, out of Google’s billions of users. People just need to start ignoring these people. They are a tiny minority of people. (It just so happens that seemingly half of them are journalists at the nation’s biggest newspapers.)
- Tenoke 6y agoI guess that's true but only until the NYT or whoever decides to join in as well.
- jeofken 6y agoNYT in the end though, is just one big blog, owned by a group with their own interests. Only when their interests line up with those of Google and Facebooks owners would they work in tandem. The solution for those wanting unfettered culture in the Information Age, not beholden to big finance and big techs whims, remains free and distributed software, such as running your own blogs, peertube, etc