4 ms·
Also important to note that the Android approach is more likely to continue to work. In many places (certainly Manhattan, where I am), everything but LTE (and I
by newhouseb 6y ago
Also important to note that the Android approach is more likely to continue to work. In many places (certainly Manhattan, where I am), everything but LTE (and I gues 5G) has long been turned off such that GSM/Edge/UMTS/etc no longer work.
- guenthert 6y agoWhat? I'd think lots of IoT and other automated data service relies on cheap and less-than-bleeding-edge technology. 3G coverage seems to include Manhattan (and most of the USA): https://www.whistleout.com/CellPhones/United-States/New-York https://www.whistleout.com/CellPhones/United-States/New-York
- fsagx 6y agoCell site visualization tool featured on HN front page a few days ago shows thousands of 2g and 3g sites in NYC https://alpercinar.com/open-cell-id/ https://alpercinar.com/open-cell-id/
- newhouseb 6y agoI wonder how this data is collected and how long it takes for a tower to not be be seen before it drops off the map. Carriers may be keeping a small (relative) amount of capacity up and running, but in the meantime prevent new activations (ATT does this with there 3G network for example), so "coverage" is a bit misleading in many cases.
- lostlogin 6y ago> everything but LTE (and I gues 5G) Oh wow. Various types of monitoring use cellular, house alarms etc. Are those things just using LTE now?
- newhouseb 6y agoIn the states, LTE Cat M1 is most frequently what's used / available from my experience for IoT. In other places NB-IoT is more prevalent (which is way slower, but also way simpler)