3 ms·

What, exactly, do you mean by the “civilian government was partially included in the genocide?” The military does not take orders from civilian government, it’

What, exactly, do you mean by the “civilian government was partially included in the genocide?” The military does not take orders from civilian government, it’s the other way around. Civilian gov has no legal or de facto control over Tatmadaw, or border control, or home affairs (police, courts). There is no civilian legislative control over Rakhine operations. Tatmadaw just does whatever they wants. And anyone who speaks against their actions is imprisoned. If AASK spoke against them they would have imprisoned her again, like they just did. The politics AASK is dealing with are complex.

nix23 6y ago
>>A day earlier, in yet another legal challenge, a Rohingya rights group launched a case calling on courts in Argentina to prosecute military and civilian officials – including Aung San Suu Kyi – under the concept of universal jurisdiction, which pushes for domestic courts to investigate international crimes. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/anaylsis/2019/11/21/Myanmar-Rohingya-genocide-allegations-Abuses-courts https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/anaylsis/2019/11/21/Myanm... https://burmacampaign.org.uk/argentinean-courts-urged-to-prosecute-senior-myanmar-military-and-government-officials-for-the-rohingya-genocide/ https://burmacampaign.org.uk/argentinean-courts-urged-to-pro... >If AASK spoke against them they would have imprisoned her again She could just stay at the Haag and tell the truth...how about that?
- freeburma 6y ago
  The complaint filed in Argentina does not establish any responsibility for genocide by Aung San Su Kyi.
  - nix23 6y ago
    You did not even read the Article: “The Rohingya people are facing an existential threat. For decades, the Myanmar authorities have tried to wipe us out by confining us to ghettos, forcing us to flee our home country and killing us. The global community must act now to end this genocide and bring those responsible to justice,” said Tun Khin, President of BROUK. Shame on you!

nix23 6y ago

>>A day earlier, in yet another legal challenge, a Rohingya rights group launched a case calling on courts in Argentina to prosecute military and civilian officials – including Aung San Suu Kyi – under the concept of universal jurisdiction, which pushes for domestic courts to investigate international crimes. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/anaylsis/2019/11/21/Myanmar-Rohingya-genocide-allegations-Abuses-courts https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/anaylsis/2019/11/21/Myanm... https://burmacampaign.org.uk/argentinean-courts-urged-to-prosecute-senior-myanmar-military-and-government-officials-for-the-rohingya-genocide/ https://burmacampaign.org.uk/argentinean-courts-urged-to-pro... >If AASK spoke against them they would have imprisoned her again She could just stay at the Haag and tell the truth...how about that?

freeburma 6y ago
The complaint filed in Argentina does not establish any responsibility for genocide by Aung San Su Kyi.
- nix23 6y ago
  You did not even read the Article: “The Rohingya people are facing an existential threat. For decades, the Myanmar authorities have tried to wipe us out by confining us to ghettos, forcing us to flee our home country and killing us. The global community must act now to end this genocide and bring those responsible to justice,” said Tun Khin, President of BROUK. Shame on you!