3 ms·
This is invalid thinking. Bad actors can make such tool themselves (if they can't, they are not really that good) and have incentive to do that, so non existen
by majkinetor 6y ago
This is invalid thinking.
Bad actors can make such tool themselves (if they can't, they are not really that good) and have incentive to do that, so non existence will only slow them down. I don't care about analyzing other people for any purpose so I don't. Having this tool readily available lets me analyze myself and people I care about to protect them from bad actors and educate them in the process.
- reaperducer 6y agoThis is invalid thinking. I'm not familiar with the phrase "invalid thinking." Can you elaborate on how a person's thoughts can be invalid?
- arkitaip 6y agoPlease keep in mind that some HNers are modeling their behavior after buggy machines and bad code and that this influences their thinking and language.
- narak 6y agological coherence and fallacies far pre-date computers and code
- majkinetor 6y agoYou are being overly literal I guess, there is nothing to explain. Invalid line of thought sounds good ? Try DDG next time.
- Ensorceled 6y agoThe sentence was unnecessary to both your point and any argument in general. Why did you include it? Why are you defending it's inclusion? Why are you now saying "google it"?
- spoonjim 6y agoIt’s a hamfisted attempt to assert the correctness of one’s argument by fiat. It’s the grown-up “are not / am too!”