I think we should also be able to summarize but not exclusively or reaching a point of cargo-culting blindly because only one book priest can read. Against over

I think we should also be able to summarize but not exclusively or reaching a point of cargo-culting blindly because only one book priest can read. Against oversimplification: There are nuances and details that are often lost as the memetic game of "telephone" gets played and introduces mutations. Also, intellectual dilettancy, whereby people no longer master any other details other than utilitarian ones; history gets lost, anecdotes get lost, and so forth. Writers should aim for concision where possible, but not skimp on evidence, rationale, or interesting anecdotes or analysis. Einstein said something about "irreducible basic elements" but never said "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Time and attention are valuable, but the essence shouldn't be sacrificed on the altar of expediency.