4 ms·

I thought I read somewhere that most of the richer people in San Francisco send their children to private schools (to the extent that the public schools were mi

I thought I read somewhere that most of the richer people in San Francisco send their children to private schools (to the extent that the public schools were minority-white in a majority-white city.) I wonder how much this happens in the Cupertino. Normally there is some reasoning that public schools do well because of rich parents who can help fund the school and who generally care about their children’s education, and that’s an guess I might make about Cupertino based on your comment, but it seems to not be the case in SF.

saagarjha 6y ago
Context: I grew up attending Cupertino schools. Cupertino schools are fairly well funded, but not as well funded as schools in say Palo Alto. It was my experience that in our school the best students did most of their learning outside of class as very few public school teachers could keep up with them. From what I hear, some parents would send their children to private schools because they would do this and the schools would have somewhat better mentoring, but overall I didn't see much difference in the quality of top students from either.
asciimike 6y ago
Have you seen the state of SF public schools lately? - https://www.sfusd.edu/about/news/current-news/SF-Board-of-Education-Advances-Plan-to-Rename-Schools https://www.sfusd.edu/about/news/current-news/SF-Board-of-Ed... (which is clearly more important than https://www.sfusd.edu/services/health-wellness/covid-19-coronavirus-resources-families-students/person-learning-readiness-dashboard-phase-2a https://www.sfusd.edu/services/health-wellness/covid-19-coro...) - https://twitter.com/hknightsf/status/1359382113875755011 https://twitter.com/hknightsf/status/1359382113875755011 - https://www.sfgate.com/education/article/sf-school-lottery-Lowell-High-15663889.php https://www.sfgate.com/education/article/sf-school-lottery-L... I think your idea of "rich parents funding SF public schools" would probably be rejected by the school board, so for most it's not even worth trying, given the proliferation of high quality private schools nearby. And even if the school accepts it, the community won't. Say what you want about Zuck, but he donated $75M to the only public hospital in the city and they don't even want to keep the building named after him and his wife (who worked there no less!). Comically, they can't actually do anything about it, so they stick to meaningless non-binding resolutions. Therefore, if given the choice, those who can are much more likely to spend 30-50k/year to send their kids to private HS than to try and go through the process of dealing with the city government. I assume that dealing with Cupertino/PA/etc. is frustrating, but not nearly as insane as SF.
- dan-robertson 6y ago
  I was trying to be quite careful in my comment to not suggest that rich San Francisco were funding public schools, but it seems I wasn’t careful enough.

saagarjha 6y ago

Context: I grew up attending Cupertino schools. Cupertino schools are fairly well funded, but not as well funded as schools in say Palo Alto. It was my experience that in our school the best students did most of their learning outside of class as very few public school teachers could keep up with them. From what I hear, some parents would send their children to private schools because they would do this and the schools would have somewhat better mentoring, but overall I didn't see much difference in the quality of top students from either.

asciimike 6y ago

Have you seen the state of SF public schools lately? - https://www.sfusd.edu/about/news/current-news/SF-Board-of-Education-Advances-Plan-to-Rename-Schools https://www.sfusd.edu/about/news/current-news/SF-Board-of-Ed... (which is clearly more important than https://www.sfusd.edu/services/health-wellness/covid-19-coronavirus-resources-families-students/person-learning-readiness-dashboard-phase-2a https://www.sfusd.edu/services/health-wellness/covid-19-coro...) - https://twitter.com/hknightsf/status/1359382113875755011 https://twitter.com/hknightsf/status/1359382113875755011 - https://www.sfgate.com/education/article/sf-school-lottery-Lowell-High-15663889.php https://www.sfgate.com/education/article/sf-school-lottery-L... I think your idea of "rich parents funding SF public schools" would probably be rejected by the school board, so for most it's not even worth trying, given the proliferation of high quality private schools nearby. And even if the school accepts it, the community won't. Say what you want about Zuck, but he donated $75M to the only public hospital in the city and they don't even want to keep the building named after him and his wife (who worked there no less!). Comically, they can't actually do anything about it, so they stick to meaningless non-binding resolutions. Therefore, if given the choice, those who can are much more likely to spend 30-50k/year to send their kids to private HS than to try and go through the process of dealing with the city government. I assume that dealing with Cupertino/PA/etc. is frustrating, but not nearly as insane as SF.

dan-robertson 6y ago
I was trying to be quite careful in my comment to not suggest that rich San Francisco were funding public schools, but it seems I wasn’t careful enough.