4 ms·
That indicates that csrutil would be able to do /something/ with secure boot policy, but I really don't interpret that as a commitment to being able to boot arb
by mjg59 6y ago
That indicates that csrutil would be able to do /something/ with secure boot policy, but I really don't interpret that as a commitment to being able to boot arbitrary operating systems - if we were still unable to do so today, I don't think you'd be able to put up a strong argument that Apple had broken a commitment.
- saagarjha 6y agoThe only thing I can plausibly interpret that as is “we’ll let you turn off secure boot” (I mean, what else can you do?). I agree that Apple never committed to anything beyond that (and I am pleasantly surprised as to how much effort and documentation went into what they have currently given) but I think it is a reasonable interpretation from the slides that getting some sort of OS loaded that isn’t Apple’s is something they had advertised.