2 ms·
Ok but there's a global pandemic on. So the upside exists, but how many people's lives are we willing to endanger for it?
by sp332 6y ago
Ok but there's a global pandemic on. So the upside exists, but how many people's lives are we willing to endanger for it?
- softwaredoug 6y ago> The researchers found that on average, patients with six or more traumatic experiences as children died nearly 20 years earlier than those without any experience I think people treat these as “soft” purely psychological issues. But childhood trauma physically changes your development and longer term physical health. Further these issues impact a lot of the population. From the original Kaiser study: > more than one in five reported three or more ACEs Citations: https://www.medpagetoday.org/primarycare/domesticviolence/16318?vpass=1 https://www.medpagetoday.org/primarycare/domesticviolence/16... https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/about.html https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/about.html https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33413909-the-deepest-well https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33413909-the-deepest-wel...
- voisin 6y agoDr. Gabor Mate has some good info on childhood trauma worth looking into.
- sp332 6y agoYes and schoolchildren who die of Covid lose a lot more years than that. Even most teachers or students' parents would be losing more than that each. Keeping schools closed may cost lives, but I don't see how opening schools in a pandemic is going to kill fewer people?