4 ms·
Fair enough and my memory may be fuzzy but I see quite a few references to V1 as being the minimum single engine takeoff speed. https://skybrary.aero/bookshelf
by xvf22 6y ago
Fair enough and my memory may be fuzzy but I see quite a few references to V1 as being the minimum single engine takeoff speed.
https://skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/493.pdf https://skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/493.pdf (page 2)
- snuxoll 6y agoIt's kind of poorly worded. Hitting V1 means you are committed to taking off, single engine failure or not - but you HAVE to reach V2 to safely climb on one engine. This should happen within moments of hitting Vr, but being single-engine after V1 means you went from hitting Vr halfway down the runway to potentially doing so at the ass-end of your minimum runway length. This means you have basically no room for any pilot error or other failures, and why engine failure on take-off is routinely rehearsed.
- xvf22 6y agoNot sure where the original disagreement came from. I never said an aircraft should be able to take off at V1. Perhaps you took the "fly" literally which is fine but that was certainly not the intention.
- zerocrates 6y agoI don't have any specialist knowledge here, but that seems to make sense. If you're under V1 then you can still abort takeoff. Having that be the minimum for single-engine takeoff essentially sets up the rule that if you lose an engine while you can safely abort, then you must.