3 ms·
They are both engaging on Twitter, and I don't see any calling out. Unless you find a good quote, that is just discussing, as adults should. It may be bad choi
by loopz 6y ago
They are both engaging on Twitter, and I don't see any calling out. Unless you find a good quote, that is just discussing, as adults should.
It may be bad choice on them both professionally, but you're singling out one..
- ergocoder 6y agoBecause she mentioned Jeff Dean first. Then, Jeff needed to ask what this was about. Then, Jeff ended with "personal attack is not okay". Like huh? At this point, we might as well ask Jeff to tweet that the earth is round. Otherwise, we would call him a flat earther. This isn't called "engaging" when one side would assume you were racist if you didn't tweet to support their cause. The word you are looking for is strongarming. The whole convo is just cringe.
- loopz 6y agoSomehow the feed didn't scroll up as far as it did now. I see some other posts before those I saw first. But that just confirms it, it's better to totally ignore any drama on Twitter, which also news organisations need to learn. Who said what, in an online forum, is just not newsworthy.
- ergocoder 6y agoI mean it would be hard to ignore when that person was your colleague... I'm sure, if it was a random person ,Jeff would have ignored