This sounds like a technicality argument - wars are in the Constitution, so whatcanyoudo? If we should respect the views of tens of millions of people in one a

This sounds like a technicality argument - wars are in the Constitution, so whatcanyoudo? If we should respect the views of tens of millions of people in one area, we should do it in another. If we think that life is sacred and we shouldn’t spend federal money to end it, let’s be consistent. there are significant gaps in funding for these services, especially in underprivileged areas. Would you support increasing WIC and other benefits for these children? Because if not, this policy decision would increase the number of people who grow up hungry.