I don't think the headline is supported by the contents of the article. The headline implies that Coca-Cola is taking some affirmative action to make people wa

I don't think the headline is supported by the contents of the article. The headline implies that Coca-Cola is taking some affirmative action to make people watch these videos. But reading the article and the linked tweets, it seems like: - Coca-Cola pays for LinkedIn Learning, an educational platform - LinkedIn Learning has a variety of paid and free content - one of the free pieces of content Robin DiAngelo's presentation with the "Be less white" phrase -- that is, anyone can watch this at https://www.linkedin.com/learning/confronting-racism-with-robin-diangelo/understanding-what-it-means-to-be-white-challenging-what-it-means-to-be-racist https://www.linkedin.com/learning/confronting-racism-with-ro... - Coca-Cola says: "The video circulating on social media is from a publicly available LinkedIn Learning series and is not a focus of our company’s curriculum" It's not clear from Coca-Cola's statement whether this means Coca-Cola has encouraged or required its employees to watch this video. Perhaps you could infer from the lack of a denial that they are requiring people to watch it, but IMO, that doesn't merit the certainty expressed in the headline.