8 ms·
It's just potential energy minimization. A tall thin iceberg will float on its size in 2D or 3D.
by lowercase1 6y ago
It's just potential energy minimization. A tall thin iceberg will float on its size in 2D or 3D.
- Retric 6y agoThat’s assuming the 2D representation is representative of near uniform density. In 2D an I-beam and and a solid beam look identical, but they don’t represent the same amount of mass for potential energy minimization. Play with 3D shapes and you could get identical 2D cross sections to float in arbitrary orientations.
- tgb 6y agoYou can but only under very arbitrary situations that aren't common in real life. And if you're assuming it's not hollow and has constant density, then I doubt there's any way to make such an iceberg except if you look at it from one specific angle: looking from the side should give it away. Yet nearly every image of an iceberg seems to show them in that way.
- Retric 6y agoThat’s a different question. In practice floating icebergs are often at a local minima not the global minima. They can be at very unstable orientations in calm seas. The constant melting process promotes instability.