3 ms·
So no surprise Rust is faster. edit nvm I thought dynamic linking slowed things down since static linking means code fits better in the cache. Looking at the p
by rrll22 6y ago
So no surprise Rust is faster.
edit nvm I thought dynamic linking slowed things down since static linking means code fits better in the cache. Looking at the points, it seems that either dyanmic linking makes code faster or people prefer slower dynamic code.
- auggierose 6y agoAnd I say you are a low down rusty coder.