>Many presumptions are being made here in "computational cognitive science" which preclude including many relevant features of animal learning and animal biolog

>Many presumptions are being made here in "computational cognitive science" which preclude including many relevant features of animal learning and animal biology. This post doesn't actually seem to be citing computational cog-sci, which is usually a bit better about these things. Instead it's addressing the field of biologically plausible (ie: with Hebbian learning rules) deep learning. > (& Not least, embedded in a motor system which has a profound effect on its structure ). Sure, but that would expose how weak so much of the present AI work actually is when it comes to studying the motor system.