3 ms·
Everyone is assuming it’s email, but you don’t need “a script” to search your own email, and you don’t need to risk getting fired sending emails to your lawyer,
by Cacti 6y ago
Everyone is assuming it’s email, but you don’t need “a script” to search your own email, and you don’t need to risk getting fired sending emails to your lawyer, you just print them out. Or wait to get fired and get them during discovery. Google isn’t going to go into conspiracy mode and risk hundreds of millions over a line manager getting fired, that’s absurd.
It wouldn’t surprise me if this “script” was trying to pull documents from manager or HR only sources and that they were related to Gebru’s employment—hence the need for a script to do a search. Which would imply she was looking for ‘dirt’ outside of her normal access and responsibilities.
That scenario would explain a lot of what’s going on here.
- pseudalopex 6y agoSaying documents could mean emails doesn't assume it's email. Axios said the unnamed source said Mitchell looked through "her messages" though. And what other relevant files would there be thousands of? Google Apps Script can do things Gmail search can't. Like regex. Lawyers I know say don't rely on discovery if you can help it. You think Google doesn't monitor printing?
- Cacti 6y agoI mean, generally speaking you can’t get fired for printing your own emails.