> the idea of canning someone for working too hard seems pretty silly I think you're taking the article too literally. It seemed to me that he was taking the (

> the idea of canning someone for working too hard seems pretty silly I think you're taking the article too literally. It seemed to me that he was taking the (decidedly silly) polar opposite position to emphasize the extremity of Jason's suggestion, and that there are perfectly legitimate reasons not to follow it, to the extent that the exact opposite could be argued. I don't think he actually expects anyone to fire someone for working overtime, just recognize that expecting overtime has negative effects.