4 ms·
So, they think they are owed a job but others are not owed Healthcare or basic dignitt
by sanp 6y ago
So, they think they are owed a job but others are not owed Healthcare or basic dignitt
- TrispusAttucks 6y agoYou're on a fishing expedition.
- rubyist5eva 6y agoNo. They just want more opportunities for jobs. Healthcare is a product/service and the very basis of individual liberty is you cannot coerce someone to provide a service to you against their will. Dignity is not given or an entitlement, it is built and earned.
- krapp 6y agoBut capitalism has optimized those jobs away, and they're never coming back. So now what?
- TrispusAttucks 6y agoMaybe government tariffs on foreign imports produced with cheap labor? Actually ban products that use child labor? (Looking at you cobalt)
- krapp 6y agoOK but the jobs still aren't coming back. Companies are just going to charge Americans more to make up the cost of the tarriffs, or leave the US as a market altogether. If the goal is to encourage domestic manufacturing, most of that work is automated now, and the rest will be competing with child and slave labor around the world. It would be better to plan for a future where human labor is no longer worth the value of human life, rather than longing for the past. And the US is never going to ban products that use child labor, because that would ban too many goods manufactured overseas, just as it's never going to be serious about illegal immigration, because the agricultural and service industries depend on under the table slave labor.
- TrispusAttucks 6y agoAny artificial economic system that is not at it's foundation an [1] evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) will bubble and pop with negative consequences regardless of the systems altruistic intent. Ultimately causing more suffering in the long term from. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionarily_stable_strategy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionarily_stable_strate...
- rubyist5eva 6y agoMost "optimization" of menial or low skill labour has been in response to government intervention into the market via things like minimum wage increases, or over-regulation. That's not capitalism.
- krapp 6y agoAll economies which are considered capitalist exist, and have existed, within the context of a state which regulates markets to some degree. A definition of capitalism which presupposes a pure free market isn't useful for discussing the real world - most people would consider the United States and the state of Texas to be capitalist, despite also being regulated. The incentives of neoliberalism and globalism are also unquestionably capitalist to almost everyone, the decisions to seek cheaper labor and more business-friendly regulatory environments as well as automation are made by businesses in order to reduce costs and create value for shareholders. Moving wealth to the capitalist class is literally the purpose of capitalism. But you can replace "capitalism" with whatever you prefer in this discussion, the incentives and outcomes in the real world remain the same.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]