> I think the 'pay attention to the media source and journalist and decide if you think they're good' is a viable route in the meantime even in the context you

> I think the 'pay attention to the media source and journalist and decide if you think they're good' is a viable route in the meantime even in the context you provided. I don't like this, again because of filter bubbles. It's very easy to fall into a 'i don't agree with this person, they must be wrong' trap. > The look stuff up yourself kinda thing always reminds me of the conspiracy theories that people develop after they 'research'.... it's so easy to find what you want to find... I would argue that this is what we're doing on HN though. HN has a policy of preferring the primary source.