3 ms·
No- even if the case happens to be about a federal jurisdictional matter (navigable waterway, or waters of the US, or USCOE jurisdictional wetlands, or direct g
by beerandt 6y ago
No- even if the case happens to be about a federal jurisdictional matter (navigable waterway, or waters of the US, or USCOE jurisdictional wetlands, or direct government ownership/agency of included or adjacent property), this one is covered by original jurisdiction to SCOTUS, since both parties are state governments.