> If they have no qualms restricting the speech of the president of America, clearly they’ll have no issue manipulating other governments. This never did make

> If they have no qualms restricting the speech of the president of America, clearly they’ll have no issue manipulating other governments. This never did make sense to me. Trump's speech was not curtailed. At any point in time he could issue a press conference and speak freely to the US, and it would be heavily attended by the press. Are we supposed to feel sorry for Trump that he decided to make twitter.com the _only_ way he communicated with the country? There was literally nothing stopping him from speaking to the country after his account was banned; he _chose_ to stop talking.