7 ms·

What you posted earlier is ridiculous because you're trying to explain the Texas grid in terms of current political trends, like the decision was made in the la

What you posted earlier is ridiculous because you're trying to explain the Texas grid in terms of current political trends, like the decision was made in the last few years.

mannykannot 6y ago
So, despite your argument being in tatters, you insist that something I wrote must be illogical, somehow? well, you are at least doggedly wrong, I'll give you that. If you are tempted to post further (I am sure you are), I suggest that you first read what I actually wrote in my original post in this thread.
- solidsnack9000 6y ago
  I suggest you read what you wrote in reply to me, and what I replied to.
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
  - mannykannot 6y ago
    Unsurprisingly, nothing has changed. Not only are you arguing against a statement I did not make, but if someone else had said that, your response is nonsense because it requires that Texas, alone, has been completely constrained by decisions made 40-90 years or more ago.
    - solidsnack9000 6y ago
      What is that leads you to say that?
      - mannykannot 6y ago
        The stream of nonsense with which you have replied to me with, of course - and maybe you know it is nonsense, as you have stopped trying to defend it. At this point, it would be better for you to acknowledge it is nonsense, rather than give the impression that you still cannot figure out that it is.
        solidsnack9000 6y ago
        What is that you leads you to say "...it requires that Texas, alone, has been completely constrained by decisions made 40-90 years or more ago."? Are you uncomfortable supporting your position?
        mannykannot 6y ago
        > Are you uncomfortable supporting your position? Unlike you, I am not. It simply comes back to an issue that you have been avoiding for quite a while: All of today's grids started with smaller, less-connected entities. That is not an adequate justification for the current situation. The idea that Texas alone is somehow constrained, by forces beyond its control, from changing with the times, is absurd.
        solidsnack9000 6y ago
        Where are you getting the idea, that it comes back to Texas being constrained?
        mannykannot 6y ago
        That is a very odd question, as it could hardly be clearer that the point here is that as there have been no special constraints preventing Texas from following the rest of the world's example in improving its energy infrastructure over the decades, your reply to my original point is irrelevant.
        solidsnack9000 6y ago

What you posted earlier is ridiculous because you're trying to explain the Texas grid in terms of current political trends, like the decision was made in the last few years.

mannykannot 6y ago

So, despite your argument being in tatters, you insist that something I wrote must be illogical, somehow? well, you are at least doggedly wrong, I'll give you that. If you are tempted to post further (I am sure you are), I suggest that you first read what I actually wrote in my original post in this thread.

solidsnack9000 6y ago
I suggest you read what you wrote in reply to me, and what I replied to.
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- mannykannot 6y ago
  Unsurprisingly, nothing has changed. Not only are you arguing against a statement I did not make, but if someone else had said that, your response is nonsense because it requires that Texas, alone, has been completely constrained by decisions made 40-90 years or more ago.
  - solidsnack9000 6y ago
    What is that leads you to say that?
    - mannykannot 6y ago
      The stream of nonsense with which you have replied to me with, of course - and maybe you know it is nonsense, as you have stopped trying to defend it. At this point, it would be better for you to acknowledge it is nonsense, rather than give the impression that you still cannot figure out that it is.
      - solidsnack9000 6y ago
        What is that you leads you to say "...it requires that Texas, alone, has been completely constrained by decisions made 40-90 years or more ago."? Are you uncomfortable supporting your position?
        mannykannot 6y ago
        > Are you uncomfortable supporting your position? Unlike you, I am not. It simply comes back to an issue that you have been avoiding for quite a while: All of today's grids started with smaller, less-connected entities. That is not an adequate justification for the current situation. The idea that Texas alone is somehow constrained, by forces beyond its control, from changing with the times, is absurd.
        solidsnack9000 6y ago
        Where are you getting the idea, that it comes back to Texas being constrained?
        mannykannot 6y ago
        That is a very odd question, as it could hardly be clearer that the point here is that as there have been no special constraints preventing Texas from following the rest of the world's example in improving its energy infrastructure over the decades, your reply to my original point is irrelevant.
        solidsnack9000 6y ago