statically typed languages with dependent types solve this problem of “static types not catching off-by-ones”, although I question the premise of these being th

statically typed languages with dependent types solve this problem of “static types not catching off-by-ones”, although I question the premise of these being the most common software bugs. Perhaps in a CS class these are the most prevalent? Furthermore, > Dynamic languages encourage more modular, more interchangeable code. Have you ever used an ML or another typed language with an actual module system? It makes these dynamic languages look duct-taped in comparison.