> If 5% more of the population goes down each time they get it Is there any reason to believe the 95% who didn't "go down" after the first time have the same 5

> If 5% more of the population goes down each time they get it Is there any reason to believe the 95% who didn't "go down" after the first time have the same 5% risk if they get it again? Not saying you are wrong or that the article is right. It's just something important to consider. It's also important to remember that even if the 95% face zero risk after they get it once, 5% of the global population is still a lot of people.