I know BAT's controversial but there's a lot to like about Brave's solution to the surveillance problem, miles better than Google's Privacy Sandbox, and whateve

I know BAT's controversial but there's a lot to like about Brave's solution to the surveillance problem, miles better than Google's Privacy Sandbox, and whatever it is that Mozilla is trying to do. The thing I don't get is, why do such a poor job at implementing a feature? Tor is synonymous with anonymity. Adding a "Tor tab" without the guarantees just reeks of a "me-too" feature and lacks that serious security and privacy posture Brave is known for (or wants to be known for). I mean, Brave comes down pretty hard on others [0]; I wish they held themselves to higher standards [1]. Forget about striving for anonymity by resisting all sorts of sophisticated fingerprinting attacks; leaking DNS is plain embarrassing. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17970567 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17970567 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23442027 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23442027