3 ms·

Well i also said i don't think journalism works in the post before. So my position on this is still that i don't think we have a solution.

• duxup 6y ago
  That seems fair, at least in the context you describe (not sure i'm there but that's not important). I think the 'pay attention to the media source and journalist and decide if you think they're good' is a viable route in the meantime even in the context you provided. The look stuff up yourself kinda thing always reminds me of the conspiracy theories that people develop after they 'research'.... it's so easy to find what you want to find...
  • lawl 6y ago
    > I think the 'pay attention to the media source and journalist and decide if you think they're good' is a viable route in the meantime even in the context you provided. I don't like this, again because of filter bubbles. It's very easy to fall into a 'i don't agree with this person, they must be wrong' trap. > The look stuff up yourself kinda thing always reminds me of the conspiracy theories that people develop after they 'research'.... it's so easy to find what you want to find... I would argue that this is what we're doing on HN though. HN has a policy of preferring the primary source.