Absolutely! I am happy to note that the paper does in fact reference How to lie with statistics in the introduction: > While discussions of misleading graphs a

Absolutely! I am happy to note that the paper does in fact reference How to lie with statistics in the introduction: > While discussions of misleading graphs are not new (e.g., Huff, 1954), empirical research on their assumed consequences is scattered across fields. So on the surface, at least, this looks like just another paper belabouring the obvious.