I find the executives legal arguments on motion 2 "not readily believable" The EGM could suspend various bits and appoint the two proposed directors pending an

I find the executives legal arguments on motion 2 "not readily believable" The EGM could suspend various bits and appoint the two proposed directors pending an election for example. Its telling the executive has not actually quoted or explained its reasoning. Maybe I should get Ivan to propose me as a board member :-)