3 ms·
No its not - why should some one doing a 9 month cover for maternity leave be treated as an employee. When "self employed" lawyers can work on the same case f
by Mauricebranagh 6y ago
No its not - why should some one doing a 9 month cover for maternity leave be treated as an employee.
When "self employed" lawyers can work on the same case for years.
Note that ir35 is not uniformly applied - unfortunately its bad employers like Uber et all that fuck it up for professionals like us.
- secfirstmd 6y agoThat's different. FAANG has thousands of contractors doing roles that are internal and integral to their company deliberately on 11 month contracts and then rolling them over. The same positions existing for years and not meeting IR35 requirements. What you describe is totally something else.
- Mauricebranagh 6y agoThat would be in the USA where yes this is absolutely disguised employment. But in the UK if say came in and did a 1 year engagement to sort out a major brands web presence - I would be considered inside ir35 (unless of course I was mate of Dominic Cummings)