3 ms·
Sure, but to truly avoid all naive readings would be to analyse the total impact of constructing the hydro plant in such an out of the way place for the purpose
by cbzbc 6y ago
Sure, but to truly avoid all naive readings would be to analyse the total impact of constructing the hydro plant in such an out of the way place for the purpose of mining.
There's an emissions cost to producing the equipment required to construct the hydro plant.
There's an emissions cost associated with constructing the hydro plant.
This is multiplied if you are building it in an area without heavy industry (no existing demand, remember?) - because you have to construct your own support infrastructure and road network to build and service the plant.
Not to mention the impact of the now flooded 'wilderness' (which is highly likely to contain carbon sinks).
Or the impact to forestation and vegetation downstream.
- jki275 6y agoAll of that may be true. But none of it invalidates my initial statement. You're arguing with a discussion that didn't happen.
- cbzbc 6y agoThe wider discussion (and this particular thread) was on the environmental cost caused by bitcoin.
- jki275 6y agoAnd I gave you some input on a specific portion of that. You then proceeded to excoriate me for not addressing everything in every discussion that has ever happened in your mind about bitcoin.