3 ms·
Good article, but I can't help but notice a gaping hole in the benchmark -- why was there no attempt to run gunicorn in multi-threaded mode? The article has a
by throwdbaaway 6y ago
Good article, but I can't help but notice a gaping hole in the benchmark -- why was there no attempt to run gunicorn in multi-threaded mode?
The article has a link to https://techspot.zzzeek.org/2015/02/15/asynchronous-python-and-databases/ https://techspot.zzzeek.org/2015/02/15/asynchronous-python-a..., but failed to mention the key takeaway from the article:
> threaded code got the job done much faster than asyncio in every case
- driverdan 6y agoThe article explicitly says they were testing single threaded use cases.
- throwdbaaway 6y agoBut why? The results would be a lot more useful if they include a single-process multi-threaded setup in the benchmark.