3 ms·
This (to its logical absurd extreme) would mean that compiled binaries are not copyrightable and only source code is. The GPL is clear here: you must release s
by mappu 6y ago
This (to its logical absurd extreme) would mean that compiled binaries are not copyrightable and only source code is.
The GPL is clear here: you must release sources in the preferred form of the work for making changes in it. For a neural network, that is the training data, models and scripts - unless you really are just editing the final weights.
- kragen 6y agoFor better or worse, US courts have not interpreted the Feist precedent to mean that compiled binaries are not copyrightable. I'm not sure if any defendant has tried that argument when admitting to copying binaries; it doesn't seem likely to be a winning argument.