> It was a leading question, pretending to claim that regulation was the cause. Nice walkback, though. Not cool. I mean, when I first read tinco's comment, I

> It was a leading question, pretending to claim that regulation was the cause. Nice walkback, though. Not cool. I mean, when I first read tinco's comment, I thought what you thought. But either reading is plausible. If you're going to call someone a liar, maybe just don't reply.