It’s not like he’s trying to use Uber’s name to promote an unrelated product, he’s using it in direct reference to the company. Regardless of how the courts ru

It’s not like he’s trying to use Uber’s name to promote an unrelated product, he’s using it in direct reference to the company. Regardless of how the courts rule, it seems pretty silly for a company to say “our name is Uber, that is how you should refer to us” and then sue someone for making an app for using that name in direct reference to them. I’d see Uber’s side if the app was for cheat sheets on exams or something, but this is fundamentally different.