4 ms·
> I'm somewhat disappointed that the author, or half the comments on the post, didn't question these _wildly_ different results though... Given that Chrome is
by dmitriid 6y ago
> I'm somewhat disappointed that the author, or half the comments on the post, didn't question these _wildly_ different results though...
Given that Chrome is busy trying to subsume the web and the OS (it has bluetooth now, and usb, and serial ports, and over a thousand chrome-specific web apis [1]), no one is even remotely surprised to see such results, because by now people just assume Chrome to be a beast. And Chrome has in the past been the most RAM-eating of all browsers out there.
The graphs should be questioned, of course, but Chrome has already earned its reputation, and it's very hard to un-earn it.
[1] https://web-confluence.appspot.com/#!/confluence https://web-confluence.appspot.com/#!/confluence see "Browser-Specific" tab
- striking 6y agoThis is a bizarre rationalization of a misleading post. So what if Chrome has features, some of which you don't care for? That doesn't make the post right.
- aae42 6y agohe's not rationalizing the original post, he's rationalizing the thread parent's > half the comments on the post, didn't question these _wildly_ different results though...