> explicitly racist fringe ideologues according to you, he is a racist. so all the people swarming the internet to dox him and misinterpret leaked personal co

> explicitly racist fringe ideologues according to you, he is a racist. so all the people swarming the internet to dox him and misinterpret leaked personal correspondence are demonstrating "Repeated and sustained interest in an allegedly explicitly racist fringe ideologue." > Weary dismissals of "ugh, gender"? oh no! > Complaints about perceived wretchedness of contemporary art? What a Philistine. > Openness to ideas about some kind of across-the-board cultural decay or loss of vigor? What moron is open to ideas in this day and age? > Paranoia about being persecuted for the intellectual courage to examine dangerous, yet important ideas? Apparently its not paranoia. > I mean, this is aggrieved doomsday conservatism in its full, florid form. You've convinced me, he's a terrible person and you're correct to misrepresent his words because he's not entitled to being represented accurately. > All that's missing is some outbursts about the ivory tower being packed with radical liberals. Well just pretend its there, that didn't stop you from misrepresenting anything else he posted.