> As much as I respect Daniel for his work on curl, this claim is simply bullshit. He was talking about "our" in the context of curl, so clearly talking about

> As much as I respect Daniel for his work on curl, this claim is simply bullshit. He was talking about "our" in the context of curl, so clearly talking about curl itself. Claiming that the claim is bullshit based on a blog post by Microsoft about a completely unrelated sample set is... not great methodology and certainly not worthy of using the "BS" stamp.