4 ms·
> None of these were colonies though. Some scholars of colonialism have considered them such, especially considering policies by which the Austro-Hungarian Emp
by Mediterraneo10 6y ago
> None of these were colonies though.
Some scholars of colonialism have considered them such, especially considering policies by which the Austro-Hungarian Empire gave land in its eastern and southern marches to magnates from Central Europe.
> And Serbia wasn't part of the Austrian-Hungarian empire.
Serbs were not limited to Ottoman-occupied Serbia or to the nascent independent Serbian state, they also lived (as they continue to today) in Bosnia & Herzegovina, and in Vojvodina. As I said, it was Serbian grievances against Austro-Hungarian rule that sparked World War I when Gavrilo Princip shot Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo – this is basic schoolbook stuff.