2 ms·
You would literally have to amend the tax code every time a disbursement check was issued. If you did this monthly, or quarterly, it would be impossible to rai
by blhack 15y ago
You would literally have to amend the tax code every time a disbursement check was issued. If you did this monthly, or quarterly, it would be impossible to raise taxes in accordance with tickets.
Or, you could just require community service instead of money for all tickets.
- barrkel 15y agoI think you're being a tiny bit silly in your objection; the amount of rebate will, in all probability, be a normal distribution and will be in a reasonable range to a high degree of certainty. If you get a rebate of 90 one year, but 110 the next, you may not find an additional tax burden of 100 especially onerous, particularly if it builds up in an incremental way. I have only a little idea of what counts as community service in the US, but from what Wikipedia lists, community service labour would enable cutbacks in state expenditure in those areas.