4 ms·
I mean, you can get several houses together. If you split between 5 houses, you still get decent bandwidth (you wont be watching 4k, but then again if you can
by unionpivo 6y ago
I mean, you can get several houses together.
If you split between 5 houses, you still get decent bandwidth (you wont be watching 4k, but then again if you can afford 4k screens ...), and the price is 100 USD + 20 per month.
If you don't have any other option this might be decent alternative
- Geee 6y agoYeah, lots of small villages in Africa or other poor countries will have shared Starlink connections.
- qayxc 6y agoThat remains to be seen. As it stands, these regions don't have the ability to pay for the service (no matter the price - they simply don't have access to bank accounts and credit cards). This is something to keep in mind and not obvious to people living in 1st world countries.
- Geee 6y agoThey can pay with crypto. Obviously there are some hurdles too and they have to earn it first.
- tuatoru 6y ago> you wont be watching 4k Netflix says you need 25 Mbps for "Ultra HD Quality"[1], so yes, you could watch a different 4K stream in every house simultaneously. And have 25 Mbps left over for other traffic. Edit to add: Netflix is right. If you can't get reliable 4K with a 25 Mbps connection, the most likely reasons are: - First by a wide margin, is that you are using Wi-Fi to connect your display device. Don't do that. Use ethernet (at least until you have 802.11ax everywhere). - Second, you have a flaky connection to your ISP. Misconfigured, marginal (e.g. DSL more than 2.5 kilometres from the cabinet) or in poor electrical condition. - Third, you have neighbours regularly operating very large electric motors or electric arc welders. - Fourth, your ISP doesn't know what it's doing, or is deliberately monkeying with your service to try to upsell you. 1. https://help.netflix.com/en/node/306 https://help.netflix.com/en/node/306