2 ms·
OK, so the constitution's optional. No problem violating it then. If you don't like what the government did, I don't mind you sharing your opinion. But how doe
by exporectomy 6y ago
OK, so the constitution's optional. No problem violating it then.
If you don't like what the government did, I don't mind you sharing your opinion. But how does it logically connect with my comment that you replied to? I thought you were giving an example showing that voters are not well informed and I pointed out that it's not objectively wrong, just different from what you want.
- konjin 6y agoNo thats literally part of the constitution. The prime minister can get fired by the queen legally and its happened iniving memory.
- exporectomy 6y agoSo just wait for that to happen then elect a new one and repeat until he/she stops violating it. Voters can still vote for a prime minister who violates the constitution if they want. That's their right, and it's a good part of democracy. Hopefully the country has other institutions to prevent that but it sounds like Australia doesn't because the queen isn't doing her job, so it ends up de-facto allowed if the voters want it.